Netflix's 'Aema': A Bold Attempt That Misses the Mark

Netflix's latest series 'Aema' features a star-studded cast including Lee Ha-nee, Jin Sun-kyu, and Bang Hyo-rin, yet struggles to maintain a cohesive narrative. The series attempts to tackle the injustices faced by filmmakers in an era that demanded nudity, but its ambition to convey multiple messages simultaneously results in a lack of balance. 'Aema' is akin to an ambitious blueprint that proves difficult to execute.

'Aema' delves into the story of top stars and newcomers resisting the dark realities overshadowed by the glitz of 1980s erotic film production. The narrative centers around the making of the erotic film 'Madame Aema,' a title that piques curiosity with its historical significance in Korean cinema. The trailer hinted at a blend of eroticism and comedy, sparking interest in how these elements would harmonize.

However, the series falls short of expectations. The first half showcases power struggles among actresses, while the latter half depicts their united front against societal injustices. The initial tension between veteran star Jeong Hee-ran (played by Lee Ha-nee) and newcomer Shin Joo-ae (played by Bang Hyo-rin) is intriguing, as their rivalry keeps viewers engaged.

Yet, the transition between the two halves feels abrupt. The transformation of Jeong Hee-ran, initially dismissive of the audacious newcomer, into an ally of Shin Joo-ae lacks sufficient explanation. The pivotal moment of change, triggered by the death of Hwang Mi-na (played by Lee So-yi), a fellow actress and girlfriend of the production company's president, seems unconvincing due to their lack of close relationship.

As the series progresses, it becomes increasingly chaotic and heavy-handed. It attempts to address numerous social issues, from the oppressive film production environment and political climate of the 70s and 80s to the rampant exploitation in the entertainment industry and women's rights. This overabundance of themes results in a disjointed narrative where each element competes for attention. The director's intent is clear, but the lack of focus and prioritization leaves each issue inadequately explored.

The actresses' revenge is neither satisfying nor complete, ending in a compromise with reality. Jeong Hee-ran concludes her vendetta by suggesting a strategic scapegoat to a higher authority, while Shin Joo-ae continues her career as a 'sex symbol' actress. For viewers, the conclusion feels lackluster.

The comedic elements in the first half elicit only mild amusement, and the revenge plot in the latter half lacks impact. This diminishes the overall enjoyment of 'Aema.' While it is neither unfunny nor unsatisfying, it fails to deliver on both fronts, leaving an ambiguous impression.

Despite the shortcomings in storytelling, the actors deliver commendable performances. Veterans like Lee Ha-nee and newcomer Bang Hyo-rin convincingly portray the struggles of actors, while Jin Sun-kyu embodies the role of a power-hungry production company president with aplomb. Jo Hyun-chul, as the director of 'Madame Aema,' realistically depicts a cinephile stifled by censorship and oppression. Although the direction of 'Aema' falls short of its potential, the series deserves credit for incorporating nudity and erotic scenes only as necessary for the narrative, rather than gratuitously.

Reported by Kim Ji-won, TenAsia bella@tenasia.co.kr