ENTERTAINMENT
Yoo Seung-jun's Legal Battle Over Entry Ban: Misunderstandings and Legal Clarifications

On October 2nd, Yoo's legal representative, Attorney Ryu Jung-sun from the law firm Innovation, emphasized in an interview with TenAsia that the public perception of Yoo seeking entry into Korea for commercial activities is a misunderstanding.

Ryu explained that Yoo applied for the 'Overseas Korean Visa,' which allows for domestic commercial activities, because there was no other option to receive a court ruling on the legality of the entry ban decision and visa issuance refusal.
"There are numerous visas, but with other visas, he would be considered a general foreigner," Ryu said. "In such cases, even if an objection is filed with the court, the lawsuit does not stand because general foreigners do not have the right to file a lawsuit. It had to be the Overseas Korean Visa." The misunderstanding about applying for a visa for commercial activities stems from a lack of understanding of the visa system.
Furthermore, Ryu stated, "As long as the entry ban decision is valid, Yoo cannot enter even with a tourist visa. One of the grounds for refusing the F-4 visa issuance is the past entry ban decision by the Ministry of Justice. If entry is banned, a tourist visa is also not issued." He lamented, "Yoo was already denied entry with a tourist visa in 2002. The entry ban period has exceeded 22 years. The initially decided period was indefinite, which is excessively harsh."
Ryu continued, "The LA Consulate General cited that actions after July 2, 2020, are harmful to domestic security and order as grounds for visa issuance refusal. They wrote as if this was not addressed in the previous ruling, but it was already covered in the past ruling." He explained, "The second lawsuit was filed after July 2020. The ruling of the second lawsuit also addressed actions after July 2020, specifically Yoo's YouTube remarks, stating they are unrelated to domestic safety and interests. There is no new fact."
