ENTERTAINMENT
Son Seung-yeon, "Nothing related" to suspicions similar to the 'Fifty Fifty Crisis'
On the 25th, Son Seung-yeon's side said, "We earnestly request that you refrain from damaging the reputation of our artist by exaggerating only some of the contents of the injunction lawsuit related to Son Seung-yeon and hiding important conclusions. I would like to say that it has nothing to do with Fifty Fifty's situation."
Son Seung-yeon's side explained the first half of the termination of the exclusive contract with former agency Fortune. Son Seung-yeon's side said, "Son Seung-yeon's exclusive contract with Fortune (CEO Lee Jin-young) was legally terminated as a result of not even providing the settlement amount or settlement statement for several months." "After the application for injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contract was rejected in February 2017, Son Seung-yeon requested the provision of a statement of settlement and payment of the settlement amount according to the exclusive contract, and Fortune said, 'If you return the bankbook in your personal name, we will provide a statement of account'. However, contrary to the promise, when Fortune received the bankbook in his personal name, he withdrew the balance and did not provide a statement of settlement or pay the settlement money. So, Son Seung-yeon asked again for the fulfillment of the settlement obligation, but Fortune did not fulfill it at all, so he signed an exclusive contract. was notified of the termination, and as a result, the exclusive contract was terminated."
Son Seung-yeon's side said, "In April 2017, Fortune filed a lawsuit against Son Seung-yeon for damages, and since the above damages lawsuit was premised on 'termination of the exclusive contract', in the end, Fortune itself admitted to terminating the contract." "As such, despite not having any intention of maintaining the exclusive contract, Fortune filed a lawsuit for damages due to Son Seung-yeon's contract termination lawsuit without disclosing the details of the settlement or paying the settlement amount, but nothing was properly explained. I couldn't," he said. "As a result, in August of the same year, Son Seung-yeon's provisional injunction against obstruction of entertainment activities was cited for the second time. Later, Fortune appealed against the decision, but the High Court dismissed Fortune's appeal, citing all of Son Seung-yeon's arguments." told In addition, "Afterwards, in the main lawsuit in April 2018, both sides agreed that 'the exclusive contract relationship between Son Seung-yeon and Fortune will be terminated, and we mutually confirm that there is no bond or debt relationship related to the exclusive contract between the two.' has ended. Therefore, the claim that Son Seung-yeon paid compensation for damages or agreed to an agreement is not true at all."
Son Seung-yeon's side said, "Even though Son Seung-yeon developed polyps on her vocal cords, which are the lifeblood of singers, during her time with Fortune, she had to work with an excessively demanding schedule. done," he said. "Since then, countless helping hands have been given to the artist who hoped for a normal entertainment activity in a correct environment rather than immediate profit, and now Son Seung-yeon is trying to reciprocate it by taking more sincere and meaningful steps than anyone else." told
Son Seung-yeon's side said, "We ask that you do not distort the truth by dealing with only some of the facts of the past that have been completed by the court's judgment. We earnestly ask you to clear up any misunderstandings and suspicions about our artists that have nothing to do with the current situation."
Recently, Dugiverse CEO Ahn Seong-il was identified by Attract, Fifty Fifty's agency, as an outside force trying to rob Fifty Fifty. Among them, Fifty Fifty filed an application for a provisional injunction to suspend the exclusive contract, saying that the relationship of trust with the agency was broken. Son Seung-yeon, who is currently a member of Dugiverse, was suspected of having a dispute with her former agency similar to the Fifty Fifty incident.
◆ Below is the full text of Son Seung-yeon's position
We earnestly request that you refrain from damaging the reputation of our artist by exaggerating only some of the contents and hiding important conclusions regarding the preliminary injunction lawsuit related to singer Son Seung-yeon, which was reported today. I would also like to say that it has nothing to do with Fifty's situation.
We would like to tell you about the facts about the termination of the exclusive contract below.
The exclusive contract between Fortune (CEO Lee Jin-young) and Son Seung-yeon was legally terminated as a result of not providing even the payment or settlement statement for several months. In February 2017, after the application for injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contract was rejected, Son Seung-yeon requested the provision of a statement of settlement and payment of the settlement amount according to the exclusive contract, and Fortune promised to provide a statement of settlement upon returning the bankbook under his/her name. . However, contrary to the promise, Fortune withdrew the balance upon receipt of the bankbook in the individual's name, and did not provide a statement of settlement or pay any settlement money. In response, Son Seung-yeon requested the settlement obligation again, but Fortune did not fulfill it at all, so he notified the termination of the exclusive contract, and as a result, the exclusive contract was terminated.
In April 2017, Fortune (CEO Lee Jin-young) filed a lawsuit against Son Seung-yeon for damages, and since the above damages lawsuit was based on the premise of 'termination of the exclusive contract', the agency Fortune itself eventually admitted to terminating the contract. As such, despite not having any intention of maintaining the exclusive contract, Fortune filed a lawsuit for damages due to Son Seung-yeon's contract termination lawsuit without disclosing the details of the settlement or paying the settlement money, but they were unable to properly explain anything. did. As a result, in August of the same year, Son Seung-yeon's provisional injunction against obstruction of entertainment activities was cited for the second time. Later, Fortune appealed against the decision, but the High Court dismissed Fortune's appeal, citing all Son Seung-yeon's arguments. Later, in the main lawsuit in April 2018, the two sides agreed that "the exclusive contract relationship between Son Seung-yeon and Fortune is terminated, and we mutually confirm that there is no debt or debt relationship between the two in relation to the exclusive contract" and concluded the lawsuit. did. Therefore, the claim that Son Seung-yeon paid damages or a penalty and agreed is not true at all.
Although Son Seung-yeon developed polyps on her vocal cords, which are the lifeblood of singers, during her time with Fortune, she had to work with an excessively demanding schedule. Since then, numerous helping hands have been given to artists who hoped to continue their entertainment activities in a proper environment rather than immediate profits, and now Son Seung-yeon is working hard to repay this sincerity and meaningfulness more than anyone else.
We ask that you do not distort the truth by dealing with only some of the facts of the past that have been finalized by the court's judgment. . We earnestly ask you to clear up any misunderstandings and suspicions about our artists that have nothing to do with the current situation.
Reporter Kim Ji-won, Ten Asia bella@tenasia.co.kr
